How the ‘yes’ vote will impact workers and HR


A look at the effect the “yes” vote will have on Australian organisations, their employees and HR.

The conclusive “yes” outcome is great news for millions of Australians and the 841 corporations that support marriage equality. However, the struggle continues to build inclusive workplaces in which all staff feel valued and that they belong.

The marriage equality debate has also created a realisation of the importance of spreading awareness of LGBTIQ+ issues in order to gain support from others and achieve equality. Allies have been integral to LGBTIQ+ people throughout this debate, and hopefully, the “yes” outcome will empower more LGBTIQ+ individuals to be out at work.

However, the marriage equality debate has been an intensely personal and often exhausting time for LGBTIQ+ individuals and allies. The “respectful debate” we were promised was instead characterised by homophobic and transphobic incidents that have caused enduring pain for LGBTIQ+ people, at least in the short term.

What’s worse, for many LGBTIQ+ people, coming out at work still represents a risk to their career and relationships with colleagues. The fear of coming out will still persist for many LGBTIQ+ individuals and workers.

Impacts of coming out still costly for some workers

Legal recognition of same-sex marriage would certainly enhance the visibility of LGBTIQ+ individuals in our communities. In Canada, the number of people who reported being in a same-sex relationship surged by a third after same-sex marriage was legalised.

However, the fear of coming out has shown to be costly to the quality of work-life and well-being of LGBTIQ+ workers. Moreover, their employers also suffer financially through staff turnover and negative reactions from shareholders.

LGBTIQ+ people who have spent years not disclosing their relationships and/or family at work may also experience psychological strains which have an effect on work, family conflict, job satisfaction, and family satisfaction.

For those who are empowered to come out, their workplace may not be a safe space, particularly in remote areas and in occupations where discrimination towards LGBTIQ+ workers is still prevalent.

Creating organisational change

The debate about marriage equality should be catalyst for organisations to look at their internal policies and practices to make them more inclusive. Inclusion isn’t a zero-sum game, it is good for business and all employees.

First, organisations should focus on creating an inclusive culture that is beneficial to both LGBTIQ and non-LGBTIQ workers. And one of the simplest ways for organisations to build an inclusive culture is through the language they use.

Inclusive language enables a diversity of people (such as those of different ages, cultures and genders) to feel valued and respected and able to contribute their talents to drive organisational performance. Simply thinking about the language we all use when addressing staff, customers and other stakeholders, asking about partners for example, can go a long way to making LGBTIQ+ and non-LGBTIQ+ workers feel included.

An appropriate use of language is also critical in respectful dialogue between workers when addressing delicate issues such as same-sex marriage. Thus, organisational policies also need to address the appropriate use of language in formal and informal dialogue at work, particularly drawing a fine line between free speech and hate speech.

Second, a recognition of same-sex relationships provides an opportunity for revisiting and updating policies relating to partnerships and families such as parental leave policies. Prior to this conversation, same-sex relationships and ‘rainbow families’ may not have been commonly discussed in the workplace. And this invisibility might be reflected in workplace policies.

The current government-funded programs only makes the birth mother the primary carer by default. This policy could be inclusive to LGBTIQ families by making it gender neutral.

Introducing gender neutrality to parental leave policies also means dads in heterosexual couples can spend precious time with their newborn babies. Many leading Australian companies already provide paid parental leave to the primary carer no matter the gender of the parent. This has a huge benefit for workforce gender equality in terms of load sharing when it comes to child-rearing and household chores.

The way forward

As society becomes more diverse and inclusive, organisations need to ensure that their policies and practices catch up with these progressive changes.

The new era of marriage equality means organisations need to become more inclusive of both LGBTIQ+ workers and their issues in order to attract and retain top talent. Equally important, LGBTIQ-inclusion makes the organisation more inclusive for everyone.

A version of this article was originally published on The Conversation.

Cathy Brown contributed to this article. She is the Policy and Research Manager at Diversity Council Australia, an Authorised Marriage Celebrant, and a member of the Australian Labor Party.

Raymond Trau is a lecturer in the School of Management at RMIT University. His research focuses on stigma and stigmatisation (particularly LGBTI related issues) in the workplace, workplace diversity, mentoring, and corporate social responsibility. 

Photo credit: MLHS  / CC BY-NC-ND

Subscribe to receive comments
Notify me of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fed Up
Fed Up
7 years ago

This comment was removed by a moderator due to inappropriate language

Fed up
Fed up
7 years ago

As the poster of the above comment, I can assure you there was no inappropriate language whatsoever. This is nothing more than biased censorship, which reflects poorly on your lack of transparency

Emily Wells
Emily Wells
7 years ago

The above article talks of using the recent result from the postal vote as a trigger to make changes towards a more inclusive workplace. Personally, I am not sure if I would use the debate and/or opinion poll result as the catalyst for change at this point in time, rather I would wait until the Legislation is finalised. My reasoning is that the debate itself (which continues) was very divisive with some people, from both the Yes and No sides, making comments that could be considered as hateful and/or intolerant towards others. The exercise of allowing people to vote has… Read more »

Lisa
Lisa
7 years ago

I too have my harsh criticisms on the postal vote process, not only from a cost perspective, but as Emily mentioned, the divisive nature of how it panned out. The debate put the LGBTI community in the spotlight with no choice it. It made me furious that the government wouldn’t just change the law and I was concerned that even a ‘yes’ majority may not be enough for them to do so. That being said, at least now the government have committed to changing the law. The postal vote, in all its resulting negativity, has not only sent the message… Read more »

More on HRM

How the ‘yes’ vote will impact workers and HR


A look at the effect the “yes” vote will have on Australian organisations, their employees and HR.

The conclusive “yes” outcome is great news for millions of Australians and the 841 corporations that support marriage equality. However, the struggle continues to build inclusive workplaces in which all staff feel valued and that they belong.

The marriage equality debate has also created a realisation of the importance of spreading awareness of LGBTIQ+ issues in order to gain support from others and achieve equality. Allies have been integral to LGBTIQ+ people throughout this debate, and hopefully, the “yes” outcome will empower more LGBTIQ+ individuals to be out at work.

However, the marriage equality debate has been an intensely personal and often exhausting time for LGBTIQ+ individuals and allies. The “respectful debate” we were promised was instead characterised by homophobic and transphobic incidents that have caused enduring pain for LGBTIQ+ people, at least in the short term.

What’s worse, for many LGBTIQ+ people, coming out at work still represents a risk to their career and relationships with colleagues. The fear of coming out will still persist for many LGBTIQ+ individuals and workers.

Impacts of coming out still costly for some workers

Legal recognition of same-sex marriage would certainly enhance the visibility of LGBTIQ+ individuals in our communities. In Canada, the number of people who reported being in a same-sex relationship surged by a third after same-sex marriage was legalised.

However, the fear of coming out has shown to be costly to the quality of work-life and well-being of LGBTIQ+ workers. Moreover, their employers also suffer financially through staff turnover and negative reactions from shareholders.

LGBTIQ+ people who have spent years not disclosing their relationships and/or family at work may also experience psychological strains which have an effect on work, family conflict, job satisfaction, and family satisfaction.

For those who are empowered to come out, their workplace may not be a safe space, particularly in remote areas and in occupations where discrimination towards LGBTIQ+ workers is still prevalent.

Creating organisational change

The debate about marriage equality should be catalyst for organisations to look at their internal policies and practices to make them more inclusive. Inclusion isn’t a zero-sum game, it is good for business and all employees.

First, organisations should focus on creating an inclusive culture that is beneficial to both LGBTIQ and non-LGBTIQ workers. And one of the simplest ways for organisations to build an inclusive culture is through the language they use.

Inclusive language enables a diversity of people (such as those of different ages, cultures and genders) to feel valued and respected and able to contribute their talents to drive organisational performance. Simply thinking about the language we all use when addressing staff, customers and other stakeholders, asking about partners for example, can go a long way to making LGBTIQ+ and non-LGBTIQ+ workers feel included.

An appropriate use of language is also critical in respectful dialogue between workers when addressing delicate issues such as same-sex marriage. Thus, organisational policies also need to address the appropriate use of language in formal and informal dialogue at work, particularly drawing a fine line between free speech and hate speech.

Second, a recognition of same-sex relationships provides an opportunity for revisiting and updating policies relating to partnerships and families such as parental leave policies. Prior to this conversation, same-sex relationships and ‘rainbow families’ may not have been commonly discussed in the workplace. And this invisibility might be reflected in workplace policies.

The current government-funded programs only makes the birth mother the primary carer by default. This policy could be inclusive to LGBTIQ families by making it gender neutral.

Introducing gender neutrality to parental leave policies also means dads in heterosexual couples can spend precious time with their newborn babies. Many leading Australian companies already provide paid parental leave to the primary carer no matter the gender of the parent. This has a huge benefit for workforce gender equality in terms of load sharing when it comes to child-rearing and household chores.

The way forward

As society becomes more diverse and inclusive, organisations need to ensure that their policies and practices catch up with these progressive changes.

The new era of marriage equality means organisations need to become more inclusive of both LGBTIQ+ workers and their issues in order to attract and retain top talent. Equally important, LGBTIQ-inclusion makes the organisation more inclusive for everyone.

A version of this article was originally published on The Conversation.

Cathy Brown contributed to this article. She is the Policy and Research Manager at Diversity Council Australia, an Authorised Marriage Celebrant, and a member of the Australian Labor Party.

Raymond Trau is a lecturer in the School of Management at RMIT University. His research focuses on stigma and stigmatisation (particularly LGBTI related issues) in the workplace, workplace diversity, mentoring, and corporate social responsibility. 

Photo credit: MLHS  / CC BY-NC-ND

Subscribe to receive comments
Notify me of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fed Up
Fed Up
7 years ago

This comment was removed by a moderator due to inappropriate language

Fed up
Fed up
7 years ago

As the poster of the above comment, I can assure you there was no inappropriate language whatsoever. This is nothing more than biased censorship, which reflects poorly on your lack of transparency

Emily Wells
Emily Wells
7 years ago

The above article talks of using the recent result from the postal vote as a trigger to make changes towards a more inclusive workplace. Personally, I am not sure if I would use the debate and/or opinion poll result as the catalyst for change at this point in time, rather I would wait until the Legislation is finalised. My reasoning is that the debate itself (which continues) was very divisive with some people, from both the Yes and No sides, making comments that could be considered as hateful and/or intolerant towards others. The exercise of allowing people to vote has… Read more »

Lisa
Lisa
7 years ago

I too have my harsh criticisms on the postal vote process, not only from a cost perspective, but as Emily mentioned, the divisive nature of how it panned out. The debate put the LGBTI community in the spotlight with no choice it. It made me furious that the government wouldn’t just change the law and I was concerned that even a ‘yes’ majority may not be enough for them to do so. That being said, at least now the government have committed to changing the law. The postal vote, in all its resulting negativity, has not only sent the message… Read more »

More on HRM