As the government has just mandated the COVID-19 vaccine for aged care workers, it’s worth considering: Could you mandate it in your workplace too?
Update 16 August 2021: Please note this article was published prior to the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) updating it’s COVID-19 vaccine guidelines. The new guidelines allow employers to mandate the vaccine where “it would be lawful and reasonable for an employer to give their employees a direction to be vaccinated, which is assessed on a case-by-case basis.” You can find more information on the FWO website.
Update 29 June 2021: Prime Minister Scott Morrison and the National Cabinet has announced the COVID-19 vaccine will be mandatory for all aged care workers. The federal government is providing $11 million in grants so employees of aged care facilities can take time off to receive the vaccine. Morrison has said the implementation of the mandatory vaccine program will use the same system currently used for mandatory flu vaccines. You can read the Prime Minister’s full announcement here and see all the latest vaccine news at the Department of Health’s website.
In an article for the Sydney Morning Herald, Qantas CEO Alan Joyce suggested vaccinations might be a requirement for all airline passengers and Ticketmaster has previously considered ways to check if punters are vaccinated before attending events.
Workplaces are also contemplating how to navigate a vaccine and the possibility of mandating it for employees. Because of this, all eyes were on the Fair Work Commission as it recently considered the case of an early childhood teacher who was terminated for not getting the flu vaccine.
The case was dismissed, but still provides insight into how employers can approach the sensitive issue of COVID-19 vaccines in the workplace.
Mandating the flu vaccine
In the case of the early childhood centre, the employer asked all staff members to get the flu jab by March 2020. The employee refused the vaccination and her employment was terminated as a result. Her refusal was not for medical reasons, but due to personal preference.
In the submission to the FWC, the employee argued her employer did not make reasonable adjustments to accommodate her vaccine refusal, but deputy president Ingrid Asbury said the employer’s direction was lawful and reasonable in the context of the workplace – she worked closely with children.
There are two important points to this case, says Michael Byrnes, employment lawyer partner at Swaab. Firstly, the reason for the employee to object. And secondly, the type of work being undertaken.
“In this case the employee was a conscientious objector to vaccines. If there was genuine medical, health or religious reasoning behind it, the FWC might have ruled differently,” says Byrnes.
Byrnes believes if the employer had been an aged care facility or health centre the outcome would have been similar, but if an employee could complete their work remotely or didn’t come into contact with vulnerable people, then employers would need to make accommodations.
Want to share your thoughts about the FWO changes? AHRI members can start the conversation over at the AHRI LinkedIn Lounge.
Mandating the COVID-19 vaccine
The flu is one thing, COVID-19 is entirely different.
Byrnes says given the seriousness of the virus and the high infection rate, employers would have a strong legal position to mandate the vaccine.
“I think the vast majority of employers would not have the right to mandate that an employee have a flu vaccination,” says Byrnes. “But in order to maintain a safe workplace for employees and customers, it would be the employers prerogative to issue a direction to get the COVID-19 vaccine.”
Even if an employee rejects the vaccine on grounds other than medical or religious reasons, an employer shouldn’t jump to terminating their employment, he adds.
“I suspect in most cases being an anti-vaxxer would weaken the position of an employee refusing a mandatory vaccine, but employers should always take steps to accommodate the employee before considering termination.”
For many workplaces, accommodations would likely include things like remote work or restricting their interaction with other employees and clients.
“Where you’ve got an employee who has a health or medical reason for not wanting a vaccination, the employer may have an obligation under the Disability Discrimination Act to make reasonable adjustments,” says Byrnes.
It is also possible workplaces could ease the mandate as the vaccine becomes more widespread meaning the herd protection of colleagues would render their vaccine status a non-issue.
If you decide to mandate…
A direction to an employee to be vaccinated is not to be made lightly, warns Byrnes. He compares it to other invasive procedures such as urine, saliva or blood testing in the workplace.
If your organisation decides to make the COVID-19 vaccination mandatory, Byrnes outlines a couple of things to consider:
- Have a good communication strategy – explain to employees why you are requiring them to get the vaccine and detail the alternatives for those who refuse. Employers should also make sure communication around the direction is two way so employees have an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns.
- Put processes in place – ensure there is a clear process if an employee does refuse, so a discussion can take place on why they are refusing and what will happen moving forward (be that an adjustment of their role or terminating their employment).
- Allow employees to get vaccinated during work hours – the Federal government said the vaccine will be free for all Australians, so there will likely be no additional out of pocket expenses for employers. You shouldn’t direct employees to use a particular vaccine supplier or administrator of the vaccine.
Byrnes highlights the importance of communication.
“People will refuse the vaccine for health reasons, some will refuse because they are anti-vaxxers. You don’t want to create a third group who refuses because they feel their employer has gone authoritarian, telling them what to do with their bodies,” says Byrnes.
“Make sure that two-way dialogue is there. Explain that it is part of your workplace health and safety and this is something everyone can do to protect vulnerable people.”
There isn’t much case law around workplaces and vaccines as it stands, but Byrnes says employers should keep an eye on the FWC as more flu vaccines cases are in the pipeline. These cases will likely have an impact on how employers can approach the COVID-19 vaccine.
There already is a third group – those who are not anti-vaxers but do not trust the haste in which this vaccine has been produced. They may also object to the version which is available.
The law Regarding vaccinations does not mandate compulsory vaccinations and does not require a reason to justify either your acceptance or non acceptance. It appears to me that the suggestion here is that the business (whatever it is) is above the law. How does that sound?
One of the major issues I have is that everyone is assuming these vaccinations will protect you from the disease. That is simply not the case. The CDC and the manufacturers of the ‘vaccines’ make no such claims. At best they say their products will alleviate the symptoms of the disease. So, if the product neither protects you nor stops you spreading the disease, what is the point of having the injection in the first place, especially when 80% of those who allegedly have the disease are asymptomatic anyway?
Mandatory /forced vaccinations are against all human rights. Whether your for or against no one should have the right over another to make them have any medical procedure or any medical invasion that the person feels is not for them. There is not enough time and research on this or these covid vaccinations to guarantee it is safe and the is no recourse to sue if there is an adverse reaction or even death. Would a employer take responsibility of any adverse reaction and be held accountable and accept liability because they forced a person to have the injection. This… Read more »
The vaccine protects the individual from the severity of the virus and does not prevent infection or transmission. Since the vast majority do not exhibit any or limited symptoms surely mandatory vaccination is draconian and unnecessary. If individuals choose to be vaccinated that protects themselves. So it makes no difference whether their colleagues receive the vaccine or not. Those that are most vulnerable need protection but someone who has been vaccinated and carrying a certificate can still transmit the virus to them. Who knows how severe the symptoms need to be to kill an aged person even if They have… Read more »